Wall of ShameTop websites, brutally roasted by AI

The internet's most honest SEO & speed audit. Celebrity AI personas roast the world's biggest sites. Updated weekly.

Leaderboard

50 sites, ranked by SEO

50 sites

#	Site	SEO	Speed	Best Roast
1	tripadvisor.com	50 C	70 C	😉“No title tag. Your page is the SEO equivalent of showing up to a party with no name tag and standing in the corner. I would know — I played that guy in a movie once.”	travel
2	reddit.com	50 C	57 C	🎬“NO TITLE TAG?! That's like releasing a film called 'Untitled.' Actually, that's worse. Even my unreleased scripts have titles.”	social
3	etsy.com	50 C	70 C	🍪“The title tag is absent — entirely, completely absent — and one cannot help but feel that this emptiness represents not merely a technical oversight but a kind of existential uncertainty about what the page wishes to be.”	ecommerce
4	booking.com	50 C	44 F	🔍“No title tag. Most peculiar. It's as if someone removed the nameplate from the door. One wonders if they wanted the page to remain... undiscovered.”	travel
5	twitter.com	53 C	52 C	🦋“No title tag! The page exists in a state of exquisite anonymity. One almost admires the audacity, if it weren't so catastrophic for visibility.”	social
6	tiktok.com	58 C	42 F	🎤“22 characters. The title has no WEIGHT. No GRAVITY. Make it mean something.”	social
7	stackoverflow.com	68 C	57 C	🎬“No meta description. That's fundamentally broken. Like launching a rocket without a guidance system. You're literally leaving SEO to chance.”	tech
8	google.com	68 C	62 C	🍎“6 characters. Too minimal — and not in the good way. There's a difference between elegant simplicity and just... empty.”	search
9	theverge.com	70 C	47 F	🎵“Title tag is 9 chars. Too short. You're leaving ranking signals on the table. That's not hardcore.”	media
10	openai.com	70 C	65 C	🔥“6 characters. Sometimes brevity is poetry. This time it's just... brief.”	ai
11	bing.com	75 C	62 C	🧙“22 characters. A title brief as a halfling's stature. Sometimes small things have great power — but not this time.”	search
12	instagram.com	75 C	54 C	🍪“9 characters. The title is too brief — it passes through consciousness without leaving a trace, like a face glimpsed from a carriage window.”	social
13	pinterest.com	75 C	57 C	🎤“9 characters. The title has no WEIGHT. No GRAVITY. Make it mean something.”	social
14	github.com	75 C	60 C	🔥“Title is 61 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	tech
15	alibaba.com	80 A	47 F	🎬“Title is 108 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	ecommerce
16	bbc.com	80 A	42 F	🇺🇸“Title is 116 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	media
17	vercel.com	80 A	65 C	🎤“Title is 67 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	tech
18	stripe.com	80 A	55 C	🎤“180 characters. You're overexplaining. The VISION should be clear in 160 characters or less. If it's not, the vision is WEAK.”	saas
19	airtable.com	80 A	62 C	😎“71 characters. A little more than search engines can show. Less can be more. You know?”	saas
20	amazon.com	80 A	62 C	🧙“The meta description stretches to 366 characters — a tale too long for the scroll of Google. Only 160 runes shall be displayed; the rest are lost to the void.”	ecommerce
21	youtube.com	80 A	62 C	😉“7 characters. That's the title equivalent of 'hi.' Try harder. Even I try harder, and my bar is famously low.”	entertainment
22	techcrunch.com	80 A	50 C	🤖“No H1 tag. This is like building a Tesla without a steering wheel. How is anyone supposed to know where this page is going?”	media
23	twitch.tv	80 A	57 C	✨“6 characters. Understated is fine when it's intentional. This just feels... incomplete.”	entertainment
24	robinhood.com	85 A	62 C	😎“161 characters. It's a little long. Search engines show about 160. It's worth trimming so people get the full message.”	finance
25	cnn.com	85 A	37 F	🎶“No H1 tag. This is like building a Tesla without a steering wheel. How is anyone supposed to know where this page is going?”	media
26	airbnb.com	85 A	52 C	📚“Title is 74 characters. Cut it. The good words are hiding under the bad ones.”	travel
27	wise.com	85 A	60 C	🔍“70 characters in the title. The evidence exceeds what the search engine can display. The excess is, quite simply, wasted.”	finance
28	wired.com	85 A	37 F	🎵“Title is 71 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	media
29	walmart.com	85 A	62 C	🎬“181 characters. More than the frame can hold. There's beauty in restraint. 160 characters. Make them meaningful.”	ecommerce
30	nytimes.com	85 A	35 F	🤖“Title is 66 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	media
31	figma.com	85 A	54 C	🍪“The meta description, at 172 characters, overflows the vessel that Google provides for it — those 160 characters that are, in their way, as rigid and unyielding as the social conventions of the Guermantes salon.”	saas
32	canva.com	85 A	62 C	🦋“26 characters. Brevity can be divine, but this is merely insufficient.”	saas
33	theguardian.com	85 A	47 F	👁“No H1 tag. This is like building a Tesla without a steering wheel. How is anyone supposed to know where this page is going?”	media
34	salesforce.com	85 A	57 C	🚀“Your meta description is 239 characters. Google truncates at 160. You're wasting bytes. Optimize or delete — there's no middle ground.”	saas
35	netflix.com	85 A	62 C	🚀“Title is 65 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	entertainment
36	coursera.org	85 A	47 F	✨“65 characters. Only 60 show up in search. Make those 60 count — they're your red carpet moment.”	education
37	ebay.com	85 A	39 F	😉“No H1 tag. The page has all the direction of a GPS that just says 'good luck.' I've been there. It's not great.”	ecommerce
38	shopify.com	90 A	62 C	😎“Title is 66 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	ecommerce
39	heroku.com	90 A	62 C	✨“OK, 0.0s load time. Acceptable. Not incredible, but acceptable.”	tech
40	anthropic.com	90 A	45 F	🍎“16 characters. Too minimal — and not in the good way. There's a difference between elegant simplicity and just... empty.”	ai
41	hubspot.com	90 A	47 F	🎵“0.0s. Quick. Clean. Like a key change that lands perfectly.”	saas
42	spotify.com	90 A	57 C	🚀“No H1 tag. This is like building a Tesla without a steering wheel. How is anyone supposed to know where this page is going?”	entertainment
43	paypal.com	90 A	57 C	😉“No H1 tag. The page has all the direction of a GPS that just says 'good luck.' I've been there. It's not great.”	finance
44	coinbase.com	90 A	57 C	🎬“79 characters. You're giving the audience the whole plot in the title. Leave some mystery. But not too much — 60 characters. Bam.”	finance
45	digitalocean.com	90 A	57 C	🎶“Title is 63 characters. Google shows ~60. The rest is literally invisible. Cut the fluff.”	tech
46	linkedin.com	95 A	62 C	✨“Title tag is 27 chars. Too short. You're leaving ranking signals on the table. That's not hardcore.”	social
47	netlify.com	95 A	57 C	🦋“OK, 0.6s load time. Acceptable. Not incredible, but acceptable.”	tech
48	cloudflare.com	95 A	62 C	😎“OK, 0.0s load time. Acceptable. Not incredible, but acceptable.”	tech
49	slack.com	95 A	60 C	🤖“0.1s load time — that's solid. Performance is one of those areas where being good is table stakes.”	saas
50	udemy.com	95 A	52 C	📦“0.0s. Good operational metric. Maintain it.”	education

VS Battles

Head-to-head SEO & Speed showdowns

amazon.comVSebay.com amazon.comVSwalmart.com amazon.comVSshopify.com ebay.comVSwalmart.com ebay.comVSshopify.com walmart.comVSshopify.com github.comVSstackoverflow.com github.comVSvercel.com github.comVSnetlify.com stackoverflow.comVSvercel.com stackoverflow.comVSnetlify.com vercel.comVSnetlify.com

Want to roast your own site for free from the terminal?

SEO roast audits meta tags, headings & structure. Speed roast audits Core Web Vitals & performance.